turns out one of my hobbies is critiquing other people's wedding announcements. and personal ads. and missed connections. (clearly, i have too much time on my hands).
anyhow, i recently came across the wedding of susie sunshine and john doe IV (names have been changed to protect the innocent). which got me thinking...at what point is re-naming your successor become too much? at which number does carrying the family name become excessive? john doe V? john doe X?
3 comments:
agree. any bastard who names their kid after themselves has totally crossed a line in my book. totally on the corner of lame and ass clown.
i know that address. it's called narcissist house.
i think IV is the longest you can go....then the child who would be V has to be something plain and simple - like jimmy.
Post a Comment