two fish and a flame: who approved this? (bad mixology edition)

Thursday, August 13, 2009

who approved this? (bad mixology edition)

clamato is wrong in and of itself. but bud...plus...clamato? how is this a good idea?

i don't think i can support their claim of "la combinacion perfecta."

(thanks, SRB!)

No comments:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Amusing Ourselves

A Nelly-Kelly dilemma
Flossy, flossy.
G-L-A-M-OR-OUS
Good times, good times.
Got another one!
I'm kind of a "BIG DEAL" around here.
I'm Natalie Imbruglia torn.
I'm stAHving (heard every Mon-Fri, around noon).
If you hang around long enough, you will end up running the place.
It was basically like a set-up. They didn't tell us nothing, we didn't think nothing, because basically we are innocent. We don't know nothing about this drugs and stuff, we don't know nothing.
It's all coming together, everything is going global.
Kiki loves you.
Note to self
Nothing beats Touché
Redunc/Ridic/Ridonks
Some days you're the pigeon and some days you're the statue.
Speaking of eye patches...
That was a Spitalfields story.
That's just how we roll.
Too much seeing of the people.
Totes
Touch Kiki!
Touching We(e) - best strategy ever. Ever!
Tune into life, [insert name here].
We've found ourselves on a trail of bullsh*t.
Well, it's technically creative.
What I like to do is...
Who the hell is this muppet?
You'll see Venus and Serena, in the Wimbledon Arena.